Questions? Call us
toll free:
1-800-856-3060
Below is an excerpt of On the Nature of Things by Lucretius as translated by Ian Johnston. To preview the book in pdf format, you can do so via our "Preview This Book" page here.
Lucretius
On the Nature of Things
I
[Invocation to Venus; plea for peace; dedication to Memmius; tribute to Epicurus; tyranny of religion; example of Iphigeneia; importance of resisting religion with reason; tribute to Ennius; Lucretius defines his task, acknowledges difficulty of using Latin; first principle: nothing is made of nothing; second principle: nothing is reduced to nothing; existence of invisible particles; presence of empty space (void); explanation of movement; sense experience as criterion of truth; no third form of nature; properties and accidents; time does not exist; primary elements are permanent; basic particles make hard and soft objects; primary particles cannot be broken up; criticism of Heraclitus; tribute to and criticism of Empedocles; criticism of Anaxagoras; analogy of elements to letters in words; infinity of matter and space; no common pull to the centre.]
Mother of Aeneas’ sons, joy of men and gods,
For
the whole nature of gods, in itself,
must for all time enjoy the utmost peace,
far removed and long cut off from us
and our affairs, and free from any pain,
free from dangers, strong in its own power,
and needing nothing from us—such nature
will not give in to those good things we do
60
nor will it be moved by our resentment.[4]
And you, [Memmius,] must direct yourself,
When to all eyes men’s life lay foully crushed 80
But I fear in these matters you perhaps [80]
And even for you the time will come when, overpowered by prophets’ horror stories, you seek to move away from us. No doubt, they can now make up many dreams for you which could disturb a life of principle 140 and with fear upset all your good fortune— and rightly so. For if men could perceive there is a set limit to their troubles, they would, with some reason, have strength enough to resist religion and prophets’ threats. But now, since we must fear that, when we die, we will be punished for eternity, there is no means, no possibility, [110] of fighting back. For people do not know the nature of the soul—whether it is born 150 with them, or, by contrast, is inserted at their birth, whether it perishes with us, dissolved in death, or whether it visits the shades of Orcus, his enormous pools, or whether, as our Ennius said in song, it sets itself, by divine influence, in other animals.[10] He first brought back from lovely Helicon a wreath of leaves that never fades—its fame is spoken of by families of men in Italy. 160 And yet after this, Ennius explains, setting it down in deathless poetry, there truly are regions in Acheron [120] where our souls and bodies do not remain, but only certain phantoms, strangely pale. From there, he says, in front of him arose the ghost of always flourishing Homer, which started to shed salty tears and then to describe in words the nature of things.
And so we must with proper reasoning 170 look into celestial matters—explain the reasons for the wandering of the sun and of the moon, the force which brings about everything that happens on the earth; and, in particular, we must employ [130] keen reasoning, as well, to look into what makes up the soul, the nature of mind, and what it is that comes into our minds and terrifies us when we are awake and suffering some disease or in deep sleep, 180 so that we seem to see and hear right there, before our eyes, those who have met their deaths, whose bones the earth now holds in its embrace.
I am not unaware how difficult it is to clarify in Latin verse obscure matters discovered by the Greeks, above all since we must deal with many things employing new words, because our language is impoverished and the subject new. But your own excellence and the pleasure 190 [140] I look forward to from your sweet friendship are prompting me to finish any work, no matter how demanding, urging me to stay awake throughout the peaceful night, seeking words and verse where I can at last hold up a clear light for your mind, and you can see into the hidden core of things.
And so this terror, this darkness of mind, must be dispelled, not by rays from the sun or bright shafts of daylight, but by reason 200 and the face of nature. And we will start to weave her first principle as follows: nothing is ever brought forth by the gods [150] from nothing.[11] That is, of course, how, through fear, all mortal men are held in check—they view many things done on earth and in the sky, effects whose causes they cannot see at all, and so they assume that such things happen because of gods. Hence, once we understand that nothing can be produced from nothing, 210 then we shall more accurately follow what we are looking for, how everything can be created and all work can be done without any assistance from the gods.
For if things were made from nothing, each type [160] could be produced from any other thing, with no seed required. To start with, humans could spring up from the sea, races of fish arise from land, and birds burst from the sky; domestic beasts, other cattle, all kinds 220 of savage creatures of uncertain birth would live in farm land and the wilderness. The same fruits would not be produced from trees with no alterations—no, they would change, and any tree could carry any fruit. In fact, were there no procreant bodies for each one, how could anything possess a fixed and constant mother? But now, because each object is produced from certain seeds, it grows out of them and comes to regions 230 of the light from places in which its stuff, [170] the primary elements of each, belongs. For this reason, it is impossible for all things to be produced from all things, since there are in specific substances powers which make those substances distinct.
And why do we see roses coming out in spring, grain when it gets hot, and grape vines ripening under autumn’s influence, if not because, when certain seeds of things 240 have fused together at their proper time, whatever is created then appears, while the season favours it, and the earth, full of life, safely brings out tender things to regions of the light? But if these things [180] were made from nothing, then they would spring up suddenly at random, at strange moments of the year, because then there would not be any primal matter which could be checked from a productive union at a time 250 that was unfavourable. And what is more, if they could increase in size from nothing, there would be no need of time for growing once seeds had joined together. For young men might suddenly be produced from infants, and groves of trees might come up from the ground, arising unexpectedly. These things, quite obviously, just do not happen— all things mature gradually [at set times], as is appropriate, [since they all grow] 260 from certain seeds, and as they get bigger, they maintain their kind, so you can understand [190] that every individual thing is fed and grows from its own particular stuff.[12] And what is more, without seasonal rains during the year, the earth could not produce her delightful fruits; then, too, without food animal nature could not reproduce the species and maintain its life. From this, you can all the more easily believe 270 that many things have many elements in common—just as we see with letters, which are the same in many words—rather than thinking any substance could exist without its primary matter.[13]
And further, why could nature not have created men so big that they could make their way on foot [200] across the sea, with their own hands tear down great mountains, and in life expectancy outlast many human generations, 280 unless the reason is that certain stuff has been designed to make specific things, and that determines what can be produced? Therefore, we must acknowledge that nothing can be produced from nothing, since with things there is a need for seeds, from which each one is made and can be brought into the air, into the gentle winds. And finally, since we perceive that cultivated lands are preferable to those left on their own 290 and, when worked by hand, yield better produce, we clearly see that there are in the earth [210] primordial elements of things, which we, by turning over fertile ground with ploughs, and taming the land’s soil, stir into birth. If there were no seeds, you might well observe that things become much better on their own without our work.
To this we can also add that nature dissolves all things back again into their own elements and does not 300 turn matter into nothing.[14] If anything were destined to die, including the parts of which it is composed, then all matter would be quickly snatched away before our eyes and vanish. For no force would be needed which could bring about the dissolution of its parts and sever their connection. [220] As it is now, since everything consists of ageless seeds, nature does not let us witness the death of anything, until 310 force intervenes to cut it into pieces with some blow or to penetrate inside, through the empty spaces, and dissolve it. And if time totally destroys those things it takes away by aging, consuming all their matter, how does Venus send back into the light of life those families of creatures, each according to its kind? When they are restored, how does artful earth offer them food, nourish, and strengthen them, 320 meeting each one’s needs? How do its own springs [230] and distant rivers flowing far and wide keep the sea supplied? How does the aether feed the stars?[15] The infinity of time and days gone by should have destroyed all things made up of mortal elements. But if those particles which make up and renew the total sum of things have been around though all the ages of those years long past, then we can be assured they do possess 330 an immortal nature. And thus, no things can be converted back into nothing.
Indeed, unless some everlasting stuff kept substances more or less connected in a mutual matrix, one common force [240] and cause could generally destroy all things, for then, in fact, a touch would be enough to kill, as is obvious, if there were no substance in a body which endured, if it were linked seeds which any force 340 was bound to break apart. But as it is, since different networks of first elements combine together and since their substance endures forever, things continue on, their bodies unimpaired, until the time an opposing force with sufficient strength, a power which can undo their structure, encounters them. Thus, there is no substance which is reduced to nothing—but all things, once dissolved, go back to material stuff. 350
Lastly, the rains vanish, when the aether, [250] our father, has poured them into the lap of earth, our mother. But then glistening crops spring up, the branches on the trees turn green, and trees themselves grow bigger and become weighed down with fruit. Moreover, from this rain our race is fed, as well as those of beasts. Thus, we see happy cities filled with youth and leafy woods full of young birds singing on every side, and fat, weary cattle 360 set their bodies down in joyful pastures, and dazzling white liquid milk flows out from swollen udders; thus, new offspring play on unsure limbs, frolic on tender grass, [260] with fresh milk stirring their young hearts. And so, what seems to disappear does not all go— nature renews one thing from another and does not allow objects to be born without the help of something else that died.Come, I have been teaching you that matter 370
[1]Aeneas is the legendary founder of the Roman people, and Aeneas’ sons are the Romans. The goddess of love, Venus, is his mother. The invocation to her and her presence throughout the poem may seem curious in a poetic argument dedicated to materialistic science, but, Serres argues, Venus has a vital role in the poem, which is advocating a more conciliatory view of nature different from the more aggressive, conquering, masculine view exemplified by Mars and Hercules and by rival theories which Lucretius is contesting.
[2]Gaius Memmius was a leading politician in Rome (tribune in 66 BC), and, we assume on the basis of these lines, a friend of Lucretius. When his political career collapsed, he retired to Athens and Mytilene. He died around 49 BC.
[3]Lucretius appears to have written these lines at a time of growing political crisis in Rome, during the consulship of Caesar and his political alliance with Pompey (c. 60 BC). He had already lived through the civil war between Sulla and Marius (in 82 BC).
[4]The passage “For the whole nature of the gods . . . resentment” (54 to 61 in the English) reappears in Book 2 (line 646 in the Latin). Many editors and translators omit them from this opening part of the poem. It seems likely, too, that after line 54 (line 43 in the Latin) a few lines have been lost, in which a transition is made to Memmius. I have added his name in square brackets to clarify the transition.
[5]Lucretius for some reason wishes to avoid the Greek word atom and its Latin equivalent, atomus, It may be that, given his desire to show how his Latin, in spite of its limitations, is capable of explaining “obscure” Greek ideas, he does not wish to use a Greek word very familiar to many of his readers. Whatever his motive, I have not used the word atom in the text of this translation (for the reason given above and also because the English word atom immediately conveys to the modern reader a great deal more information than the Greek word did to Lucretius or to his readers).
[6]The “Greek man” is Epicurus (341-270 BC), a Greek philosopher, founder of the school of philosophical thought called Epicureanism. None of his work remains, except for some fragments.
[7]Lucretius commonly uses the term world (mundus) to refer to the universe visible from earth. It does not mean earth, which is part of this world, or the entire universe, which contains many worlds. As Lucretius makes clear later in the poem, this world is a sphere enclosed in fiery aether. Hence, as Bailey observes, the expression about the bulwarks of the world is to be taken literally
[8]Boundary stones were important marks designating property lines. Smith notes that the Romans had a special god (Terminus) whose job it was to protect them.
[9]Homer gives Agamemnon’s eldest child the name Iphianassa. However, the girl is usually called Iphigenia. Smith suggests that Lucretius uses the Homeric name in order to give his poem more epic weight. Agamemnon, the leader of Greek expedition to Troy had offended the goddess Artemis, who then sent contrary winds to prevent the fleet assembled at Aulis from sailing. The prophet Calchas told Agamemnon he would have to sacrifice his daughter in order to get favourable winds. In some versions of the story Agamemnon lured Iphigenia to Aulis by telling her she was going to be married to Achilles. Agamemnon sacrificed his daughter, and the fleet sailed to Troy. Trivia is another name for the Greek goddess Artemis or her Roman equivalent, Diana.
[10]Quintus Ennius (239-169 BC) was a Latin poet and playwright, none of whose works survives except in fragments. He was considered the first great Latin poet. Orcus is the Roman god of the underworld.
[11]This is the most important basic principle of Epicurean materialism: everything is composed of matter and must be made by the actions of matter, without divine miracles which produce a physical object out of nothing at all.
[12]I follow Munro’s suggested emendation of the text in lines 188-189 of the Latin. The additional words are in square brackets.
[13]Lucretius here introduces one of his favourite analogies, comparing the letters of the alphabet used in the formation of words with the primary particles used in the formation of substances. The analogy is all the more pertinent in Latin because the world elementum [plural elementa] refers to both letters and particles.
[14]The second basic principle of Epicurean materialism is stated here: no substance can be reduced to nothing.
[15]Aether (or ether) is the material stuff which fills space, surrounding and containing all planets and stars. Since the stars are burning fires, they must be fed.
Sign up to receive notice of free eBooks, new releases and special subscriber-only offers.
(You can unsubscribe at any time)